DR JUL.-1
Consider a pair of shoes from early 18th-century Britain—an era when high heels were not yet ensnared within the modern gender binary. While today’s fashion conventions would hastily categorize the shoe as feminine, such assumptions betray the profoundly cultural, not anatomical, foundations of fashion. Although there are measurable physiological distinctions between male and female feet—differences in width, arch, and proportion—these do not necessitate the vastly divergent aesthetic and structural choices seen in contemporary footwear. The dissimilarities we now associate with gendered shoes are less rooted in physical needs than in socially constructed expectations and the performative roles individuals were meant to embody. Footwear, being intimately connected to the body, serves not merely as a tool for mobility but as a mediator of societal function. It shapes posture, gait, and spatial access, thereby embedding social hierarchies and roles into physical comportment. Stilet...