DR MAY-20

 Articles Daily+ | Just ₹55/month

Sharpen your VARC with 4 daily CAT-level articles in 1 PDF — curated from AEON Essays, The Guardian, The New York Times, Philosophy Now & more.

✔️ Paragraph-wise Main Ideas
✔️ Words to Note (with meanings)
✔️ Summary & Conclusion
✔️ Doubt-solving by 99+ %ilers

No fluff. Just focused, high-quality prep — every single day.
Join now. Stay consistent. Score higher.

DM to get your subscription today - @astiflingsoul

Daily blogs group link ( Articles Daily ) - https://t.me/+iDu9uo07kEgzOTE1

------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Brodmann’s map is the one that caught on and persisted, most likely because neuroanatomists resisted excessive partitioning of the cerebral cortex, and even today, students and researchers continue to refer to cortical regions via his nomenclature. Though relatively little was known about cortical functionalities during his time, Brodmann held the conviction that his delineations identified ‘organs of the mind’; he believed that each cortical area fulfilled a distinct function. When he joined the Vogts’ laboratory, he was encouraged to further their central thesis—that distinct cytoarchitectonic areas corresponded to specific physiological processes. This pursuit was grounded in a logic that borders on axiomatic in biology: function is intimately tethered to structure. In this context, structurally disparate cortical regions—varying in cellular composition, arrangement, and density—were postulated to subserve divergent functions. Hence, through meticulous microanatomical characterization, they aspired to uncover the discrete functional units of the cortex, ranging across sensory, motor, and cognitive modalities.

In contrast to other organs with clearly demarcated anatomical boundaries, the cortex does not exhibit conspicuous macroscopic subdivisions, compelling early 20th-century neuroanatomists to embark on the elusive quest for these mental organs—a pursuit that remains central to contemporary neuroscience. A corollary of this endeavor was the belief that each discrete cortical region—such as Brodmann’s area 17—executed specialized mechanisms, notably visual sensory processing in that instance. Thus, understanding the operation of individual brain areas was deemed crucial, with each area functioning as a mechanistic node within the broader architecture of the nervous system. This framework hinged on the premise that cortical regions could be functionally defined and that their functions were relatively circumscribed.

Accordingly, neuroscientific interest in region-specific functions flourished. One could say, for instance, that the primary visual cortex undergirds visual perception or a more elementary visual computation, such as detecting edges—abrupt transitions from light to dark in visual stimuli. Analogous descriptions were extendable to other sensory and motor cortical zones. However, this exercise becomes markedly intractable when considering non-sensory, non-motor areas, whose operational principles elude straightforward functional attribution. Yet the theoretical premise endures: a comprehensive list of area-function mappings, denoted as L = {(A1, F1), (A2, F2), … , (An, Fn)}, could, in principle, capture the functional architecture of the brain.

However, a serious epistemological impasse arises—such a definitive list has yet to be systematically compiled, and prevailing research casts doubt on the feasibility of this endeavor. Initial mappings like (A1, F1) evolve into multi-function associations—A1 → {F1, F2, … , Fk}—undermining the notion of a simplistic one-to-one correspondence. If functional attribution is not univocal, the foundational question becomes: what kind of system is the brain? This quandary is central to the emerging ‘entangled brain’ paradigm. Anatomical connectivity—the complex system of neuron-to-neuron signaling via axons—provides an intricate substrate for understanding brain organization. Axons, with lengths ranging from sub-millimeter to over 15 cm, traverse the central nervous system via grey and white matter pathways. These anatomical highways facilitate both local and long-distance neuronal interactions, forming a dense web of cortical interconnectivity.

For instance, research in macaque monkeys indicates that about 60% of cortical region pairs share direct connections, with signal strength diminishing over distance. Further complexity emerges from regions functioning as communication hubs, akin to central airports in aviation networks. Moreover, the cortex is enmeshed with subcortical structures through extensive loops, transforming our understanding of components like the thalamus—not as passive relays, but as integral nodes in a cortical-thalamic system. Even primitive subcortical structures like the hypothalamus possess far-reaching connections. Consequently, the brain emerges as a combinatorially interconnected network, challenging the conventional conceptualization of discrete modules and inviting a rethinking of categories like cognition, perception, and action as distributed, dynamically coordinated phenomena.

Difficult Word Meanings

  • Cytoarchitectonic: relating to the cellular composition of a biological tissue, especially the cerebral cortex

  • Modality: a particular mode in which something exists or is experienced, often referring to sensory inputs

  • Corollary: a proposition that follows from (and is often appended to) one already proved

  • Epistemological: relating to the theory of knowledge

  • Univocal: having only one possible meaning or interpretation

  • Substrate: an underlying layer or substance; in biology, the base on which an organism lives or operates

  • Enmeshed: entangled in a complex situation or system

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 17
Word Count: 598

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DR JUN.-3

Boost Your VARC Scores with Articles Daily+! 🔥 Want to level up your comprehension for CAT VARC ? Here’s how to make the most of your Articles Daily+ experience — just follow these 5 simple steps every day to the pdf attached : 🧠 1. Read mindfully – Keep a 🖊️pen and 📝paper handy. Jot down key ideas or words from each paragraph as you go. 🚫 2. Don’t fear tough words – Skip them on first go. Focus on understanding the overall meaning of the passage instead of getting stuck. 🧩 3. Summarize smartly – After reading, write your own summary combining the main ideas in your own words. 🎯 📊 4. Compare & learn – Check your summary against the one provided. See how close you got to the core message of the article! 📚 5. Decode tough vocab – Check out the difficult words list provided. See if your contextual guesses were accurate. Don’t mug them up — repeated exposure = natural comfort! 💡 💥 Do this for the daily 4 articles of Articles Daily+ for 1 month — and watch your comprehension ...
Read more

Articles Daily reading digest

 By any conceivable metric, the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century constituted a watershed moment in the gestation of our contemporary secular epoch. This epochal transformation is frequently construed as the moment wherein scientific inquiry emancipated itself from the epistemological fetters of medieval theological dogma, embarking upon an autonomous trajectory that repudiated metaphysical exegeses in favor of an inquiry exclusively anchored in the disenchanted, mechanistic cosmos. Yet, such an interpretation, at best, encapsulates merely a partial veracity. Medieval scientific paradigms, generally speaking, adhered to the Aristotelian schema, elucidating phenomena through an invocation of the intrinsic causal efficacies innate to natural entities. Deific agency remained an operative principle insofar as it was posited that God had originally imbued these entities with their properties and ostensibly ‘concurred’ with their quotidian operations. Nevertheless, the mat...
Read more

DR JUL.-28

 It resembled a fragment of driftwood adrift upon the ochre-hued tumult of floodwaters, unassuming and inert, until two eyes emerged with quiet deliberation above the water’s surface. As the canoe neared, the crocodile lunged without warning, attempting to unseat its occupant. Bereft of recourse, the woman propelled her canoe toward an overhanging copse of trees. In her desperate leap to grasp a branch, the reptile rose, too, dragging her beneath the surface in a harrowing death roll. “That was the worst part of the whole experience,” she recounted from her hospital bed, voice wavering in retrospective dread. “The part that I still don’t like to remember.” In the torrid February of 1985, Val Plumwood, an Australian eco-philosopher of formidable intellect, survived this primeval encounter on a secluded river in Kakadu, a remote region of immense biodiversity. Submerged thrice beneath the water's opaque surface, she clawed herself, grievously wounded, up the embankment, fabricating ...
Read more