DR JUNE-2

  Articles Daily+ | Just ₹55/month

Sharpen your VARC with 4 daily CAT-level articles in 1 PDF — curated from AEON Essays, The Guardian, The New York Times, Philosophy Now & more.

✔️ Paragraph-wise Main Ideas
✔️ Words to Note (with meanings)
✔️ Summary & Conclusion
✔️ Doubt-solving by 99+ %ilers

No fluff. Just focused, high-quality prep — every single day.
Join now. Stay consistent. Score higher.

DM to get your subscription today - @astiflingsoul

Daily blogs group link ( Articles Daily ) - https://t.me/+iDu9uo07kEgzOTE1

------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

                                                            Article

In In Our Own Image (2015), artificial intelligence expert George Zarkadakis meticulously traces the evolving conceptual metaphors that have, over the last two millennia, been employed in the effort to elucidate the elusive nature of human intelligence. One of the earliest and most theologically entrenched metaphors, canonized within the biblical tradition, envisioned humans as divine artifacts—molded from inert matter such as clay or dust and subsequently animated by a supernatural breath or spirit. This spiritual endowment, while semantically elegant, functioned more as a grammatical placeholder than a genuine explanatory mechanism for cognition.

By the 3rd century BCE, advancements in hydraulic engineering catalyzed a paradigmatic shift, birthing the notion that the movement of bodily fluids—referred to as ‘humours’—was not merely a physiological phenomenon but the cornerstone of mental and physical well-being. This hydraulic metaphor, despite its inherent limitations, endured with remarkable tenacity for over 1,600 years, thereby constraining medical understanding and practice through an archaic epistemological lens.

The Renaissance ushered in mechanical automata—ingenious contraptions driven by springs and gears—which in turn inspired thinkers like René Descartes to postulate that humans, too, were intricate machines. Thomas Hobbes extended this mechanistic vision by hypothesizing that cognition was the byproduct of minuscule mechanical motions within the cerebral substrate. The Enlightenment's exploration of electricity and chemistry fostered yet more metaphors, culminating in Helmholtz’s 19th-century analogy likening the brain to a telegraph system, transmitting signals across an electrified network.

As the 20th century dawned, John von Neumann made an audacious assertion: the human nervous system was, prima facie, digital. He underscored striking parallels between the then-nascent architecture of computing devices and the human brain’s anatomical structures. Following this, the 1951 publication of George Miller’s Language and Communication catalyzed what would evolve into the field of cognitive science—a multidisciplinary venture grounded in the metaphor of the brain as an information-processing system, with thoughts analogized to software and the brain itself to hardware.

This computational metaphor reached its apotheosis in von Neumann’s The Computer and the Brain (1958), where despite admitting the paucity of empirical data on the brain’s role in memory and reasoning, he persisted in drawing correspondences between neural function and machine computation. In the decades that followed, bolstered by rapid advancements in both computer technology and neuroscience, an expansive intellectual enterprise emerged, seeking to decode human intelligence through the lens of information processing. Contemporary proponents like Ray Kurzweil continue this tradition, speculating on neural 'algorithms' and structural affinities between biological neural networks and silicon-based circuits.

Yet, this metaphor—pervasive and influential as it is—remains precisely that: a metaphor. It is an interpretive scaffold for a phenomenon we do not yet fully understand, just as past metaphors (be they hydraulic, mechanical, or telegraphic) once served before their eventual obsolescence. In an anecdote revealing the metaphor’s conceptual entrenchment, the author recounts challenging a cohort of elite researchers to describe human intelligence devoid of any reference to information processing. Their silence, both in person and in subsequent correspondence, betrayed not arrogance but intellectual paralysis—testament to the metaphor’s 'stickiness'.

The central logical flaw of the IP metaphor is encapsulated in a syllogism that appears valid but is fundamentally unsound: premise one, all computers can behave intelligently; premise two, all computers are information processors; conclusion—therefore, all intelligent entities must be information processors. This fallacy, when eventually recognized by posterity, will likely seem as quaint and misguided as its metaphorical ancestors.

To illustrate how deeply these metaphors color our cognition, the author recounts a classroom exercise wherein a student is asked to draw a dollar bill from memory—a task inevitably producing distortion. Only when the actual object is revealed can an accurate reproduction be attempted. This exercise, quite pointedly, demonstrates the limitations of metaphor-dependent cognition: we remember by analogy, not by understanding.

Word Count: 695
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 17

Meanings of Difficult Words:

  • Elucidate: to make something clear or explain.

  • Paradigmatic: serving as a typical example or model.

  • Epistemological: related to the study of knowledge.

  • Tenacity: persistence or determination.

  • Substrate: underlying layer or substance.

  • Apotheosis: the highest point in the development of something; climax.

  • Empirical: based on observation or experience rather than theory.

  • Paucity: scarcity or insufficiency.

  • Affinities: natural relationships or resemblances.

  • Scaffold: a structure or framework used for support.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DR JUN.-3

Boost Your VARC Scores with Articles Daily+! 🔥 Want to level up your comprehension for CAT VARC ? Here’s how to make the most of your Articles Daily+ experience — just follow these 5 simple steps every day to the pdf attached : 🧠 1. Read mindfully – Keep a 🖊️pen and 📝paper handy. Jot down key ideas or words from each paragraph as you go. 🚫 2. Don’t fear tough words – Skip them on first go. Focus on understanding the overall meaning of the passage instead of getting stuck. 🧩 3. Summarize smartly – After reading, write your own summary combining the main ideas in your own words. 🎯 📊 4. Compare & learn – Check your summary against the one provided. See how close you got to the core message of the article! 📚 5. Decode tough vocab – Check out the difficult words list provided. See if your contextual guesses were accurate. Don’t mug them up — repeated exposure = natural comfort! 💡 💥 Do this for the daily 4 articles of Articles Daily+ for 1 month — and watch your comprehension ...
Read more

Articles Daily reading digest

 By any conceivable metric, the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century constituted a watershed moment in the gestation of our contemporary secular epoch. This epochal transformation is frequently construed as the moment wherein scientific inquiry emancipated itself from the epistemological fetters of medieval theological dogma, embarking upon an autonomous trajectory that repudiated metaphysical exegeses in favor of an inquiry exclusively anchored in the disenchanted, mechanistic cosmos. Yet, such an interpretation, at best, encapsulates merely a partial veracity. Medieval scientific paradigms, generally speaking, adhered to the Aristotelian schema, elucidating phenomena through an invocation of the intrinsic causal efficacies innate to natural entities. Deific agency remained an operative principle insofar as it was posited that God had originally imbued these entities with their properties and ostensibly ‘concurred’ with their quotidian operations. Nevertheless, the mat...
Read more

DR JUL.-28

 It resembled a fragment of driftwood adrift upon the ochre-hued tumult of floodwaters, unassuming and inert, until two eyes emerged with quiet deliberation above the water’s surface. As the canoe neared, the crocodile lunged without warning, attempting to unseat its occupant. Bereft of recourse, the woman propelled her canoe toward an overhanging copse of trees. In her desperate leap to grasp a branch, the reptile rose, too, dragging her beneath the surface in a harrowing death roll. “That was the worst part of the whole experience,” she recounted from her hospital bed, voice wavering in retrospective dread. “The part that I still don’t like to remember.” In the torrid February of 1985, Val Plumwood, an Australian eco-philosopher of formidable intellect, survived this primeval encounter on a secluded river in Kakadu, a remote region of immense biodiversity. Submerged thrice beneath the water's opaque surface, she clawed herself, grievously wounded, up the embankment, fabricating ...
Read more